Nika F. Aldrich
Nika Aldrich helps clients protect intellectual property in complex, highstakes litigations. He has represented innovative companies nationwide in numerous patent disputes involving computer hardware, computer software, computer algorithms, medical devices, MEMS, and other technologies.
In addition to trial court litigation, Nika has successfully defendant patents in inter partes proceedings before the Patent Office, and has handled numerous appeals in IP cases, including before the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Nika’s pre-law technical expertise focuses on digital signal processing, a field in which he published multiple papers and authored a college textbook.
Nika is particularly attuned to the policy issues related to IP. He is a patent law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, has published several law review articles and countless articles in journals and other publications, and is co-editor of Fresh from the Bench, a weekly circulation summarizing newly issued, precedential patent decisions. He has also been cited in Forbes and other publications for his insights in developments in the law.
He previously worked at the U.N. World Intellectual Property Organization, where he studied the intersection of the U.N. Millennium Goals with international IP systems.
- First-chair trial attorney in a two week patent trial involving utility and design patents, including a jury verdict awarding total profits in the first design patent trial after the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Samsung v. Apple.
- Argued a precedential appeal to the Federal Circuit regarding an inter partes review decision concerning patents for waterproofing textiles.
- Successfully represented a medical device company defending two patents against inter partes review challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board; numerous claims, including all claims from one of the patents, were upheld as valid.
- Won summary judgment of non-infringement in a patent suit brought in the Central District of California accusing a company that designs and manufacturers glucose sensors of patent infringement.
- Successfully argued multiple Markman hearings, including in the fields of apparel, medical devices, and construction.
- Representing a manufacturer of glucose-sensing products in several actions in both federal courts and at the Patent Office concerning patents relating to glucose-sensing technologies.
- Has been involved in numerous inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
- Handled multiple patent cases for a medical device manufacturer involving transducers, medical monitor design and intravascular guide wire design.
- Represented a clothing manufacturer in litigation regarding design and utility patents covering high performance textiles.
- Represented a securities exchange in copyright and misappropriation lawsuit regarding the right to list options on financial indexes.
- Obtained favorable settlements for a large pharmaceutical company in trademark, trade dress, and anti-counterfeiting cases.
- Provided pro bono legal services to a death row inmate, tenants in housing disputes, parties in divorces and students in lawsuits against schools.
- Serves as outside general counsel to the Audio Engineering Society.
Won an “exceptional case” determination, attorneys’ fees, and expert fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in a patent infringement case brought by Dexcom, Inc. against AgaMatrix, Inc. concerning glucose sensors.
Memberships & Awards
- Oregon State Bar Association, Member, Technology Section Committee
- Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court (2013-2015)
- Super Lawyer “Rising Star - New York Metro” (Intellectual Property), 2014 and 2015
- “Toastmaster of the Year” award for public speaking
Resources & Ideas
- Law 360Law 360, May 23, 2018
- Billboard MagazineBillboard, April 10, 2018
- Law360Law360, April 9, 2018
- Portland Business JournalMarch 5, 2018
- Law360March 5, 2018
- March 12, 2018
- November 17, 2017
- November 15, 2017
- Patentlyo.com, October 3, 2017
- Oregon Business, October 11, 2017
- Law 360, October 3, 2017
- August 12, 2016
- January 8, 2012
Seminars & Speaking Engagements
- "Winning Your Trial with Tech"DRI Young Lawyer's ConferenceJune 21, 2018
- Washington State Patent Law Association Intellectual Property SectionMay 16, 2018
“In Search of a (Narrower) Meaning – Recent Developments Concerning Claim Construction,” Oregon State Bar Intellectual Property Section
August 3, 2016
“Review of 2016 Patent Law Cases At The Supreme Court,” Certified Patent Valuation Analysts
July 11, 2016
“The Important But Often Overlooked Role of Design Patents”
March 29, 2015
“Wonderland: The World Under Alice,” Silicon Valley Intellectual Property Lawyer’s Association
March 9, 2015
- July 16, 2018
- July 9, 2018
- July 3, 2018
- June 25, 2018
- Breaking IP News: US Supreme Court Issues Significant Decision On Extraterritorial Application Of U.S. Patent LawsJune 22, 2018
- June 18, 2018
- June 11, 2018
- June 4, 2018
- May 29, 2018
- May 21, 2018
- May 14, 2018
- May 7, 2018
- April 30, 2018
- April 24, 2018
- April 23, 2018
- April 16, 2018
- April 9, 2018
- April 2, 2018
- March 26, 2018
- March 19, 2018
- March 12, 2018
- March 5, 2018
- February 26, 2018
- February 16, 2018
- February 12, 2018
- February 5, 2018
- January 16, 2018
- August 3, 2016
- March 14, 2016
- Inside CounselMarch 4, 2016
- Portland Business Journal, February 25, 2016
- January 19, 2016
- Law 360, September 30, 2015
- September 21, 2015
"Recent Supreme Court Cases May Require More Deference in Review of Obviousness Cases," 56 IDEA 1, 1 (December 2015)
"Another Arrow in the Quiver for Patent Defendants — Federal Circuit Approves Broad Claim Construction Protocol for Inter Partes Reviews," 22 INTELL. Prop. Today, No. 3, at 10 (March 2015)
"Overbroad Patent Claims May Be Challenged Earlier in Case," Law360 (January 6, 2015)
"Recent Supreme Court Decision Results in Resolution of Patent Eligibility Issues Early in Cases," 21 Westlaw J. INTELL. Prop., No. 15, at 3 (2014)
"Federal Circuit Enforces Written Description Requirement Even for Negative Limitations and Narrower Claims," Drug Discovery News, Vol. 10 No. 1 (January 2014)
"The Increased Value of Invalidity Opinions After the Federal Circuit's Ruling in Commil USA v. Cisco Systems," 20 Westlaw J. INTELL. Prop., No. 10, at 3 (2013)
"A System of Logo-Based Disclosure of DRM On Download Products," 8 J. High Tech. L. 57 (2008)
"An Exploration of Rights Management Technologies Used in the Music Industry," B.C. INTELL. Prop. & Tech. Forum, 983 (2007)
"Unplugged: The Music Industry's Approach to Rolling Contracts on Music CDs," 6 Chi.-Kent J. INTELL. Prop. 280 (2007)
Digital Audio Explained; For the Audio Engineer, Sweetwater Press (2004)
"Exploring Dither in Floating Point Systems," Sweetwater Sound (2005)
"Digital Distortion in CD's and DVD's: The Consequences of Traditional Digital Peak Meters," Trillium Lane Labs (2003)
- Lewis & Clark School of Law, Adjunct Professor, patent law and policy
- Purdue UniversityBachelor's degree (2004)
- University of WashingtonJuris Doctor degree (2007)
United States Supreme Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
United States District Court for the Western District of New York
United States District Court for the District of Oregon
United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
Oregon State Courts
New York State Courts
Washington State Courts
Outside The Office
- Running, including the New York City Marathon.